Monday, October 22, 2018

Female Convict Health Assignment

Our last utas unit was one of the most challenging yet. Our final assignment was putting one convict in a greater context. I choose the topic of risks to convict health on the journey out to the Colony.

My previous research and blog on my ancestor, Mary Brien, had made me very curious about her mental health as her behaviour just seemed to reveal traces of depression, trauma and even bi-polar.

As I began my research into my chosen topic, having no idea whether I'd get anywhere close to assignment material, a fascinating insight into female convict mental health unfolded. Hysteria, as it was then called, was pretty rife, as you would indeed expect in such traumatic circumstances these women found themselves in. 

This essay discusses health risks of female convicts transported to Van Diemen’s Land between 1822 and 1853. The key aspect presented is that of mental health. Mental illness even today can be difficult to diagnose and quantify. The circumstances such as these convict women found themselves in, such as desperate social and economic conditions, imprisonment, exile and forced separation from their children, must have been fertile ground for anxiety, depression, trauma and to use an outdated term, a nervous breakdown.

An example of a typical convict was Mary Brien. Mary arrived in VDL on the Blackfriar in 1851, age 30, with her ten-year-old daughter. She was reported as being troublesome in the Irish prison but quiet on the voyage out. [i] Upon arrival her daughter was taken to the Orphanage, mother and daughter separated.[ii]  Mary is not mentioned by John Moody, the Surgeon Superintendent on the Blackfriar, so she obviously suffered no illness severe enough to be hospitalized or logged. Nevertheless, Mary’s subsequent life in the colony was not particularly trouble-free.
When Mary’s postings began, the first lasted less than two weeks. Mary was then shunted between Brickfields Hiring depot and the House of Correction five times until her second hiring a year later. It seems Mary’s first year didn’t go so smoothly. Examination of Mary’s record reveals a pattern. Each year for the next six years, she had short stints of hiring followed by more time at Brickfields, two court appearances and even more time at the House of Correction.[iii] Clearly, she was a difficult one. Mary was continually reprimanded, namely, for insolence, misconduct and neglect of duty. It seems Mary had an attitude problem. Was Mary just a fiery Irish woman, or did her mental and emotional issues run deeper?


                                                        portarthur.org.au


Evidence of convict women’s mental states after transportation is scant, and Mary’s mental state is speculation only, however evidence is prevalent as to the mental health of women such as Mary on the long voyage out. John Moody commented that it was not an easy thing to assess the physical and mental states of so many who have come to him from the confines of a difficult prison situation. With so many temperaments to manage, making on the spot diagnosis of mental health would have been impossible. It didn’t take too long before John Moody had a mental heath issue to deal with though. The night before sailing, John describes treating Catherine Walsh, a Lunatic who was lucid upon embarkation. As it was too late to disembark her, the poor girl was strait jacketed. Again, after two months at sea, he describes Anne Torpey, a ‘stout girl of nervous temperament’, one night jumping out of bed screaming and running about in a frantic state. She was hospitalized for several days.[iv]

                                        Surgeons reports give fascinating insight into the voyage out.    blogs.ancestry.com.au

The terminology used at the time, was Hysteria. By the 1800’s Hysteria was being seen by professionals as less of a disease of the uterus or demon possession, and more correctly as a mental condition. Symptoms described by these surgeons were seizure like paroxysms, fainting, irrational behavior and unresponsive and hyper responsive conditions, symptoms that would now be recognized as depression in all its forms, traumatic stress and anxiety.[v]
Indeed, on closer examination of Surgeon’s reports from female transportation ships, Hysteria pops up regularly. It had to be quite disruptive and severe to make a Hospital admission. Of these reports, some are brief and to the point, while others are extremely detailed and give fascinating insight to day to day life on board. Some Surgeons comment predominantly on weather, while others, conditions of cleanliness and routines of the women. Frequently Hysteria is listed on the summary only and some surgeons make mention of its prevalence only in their remarks written at the end of the voyage. Hence, cases of Hysteria were possibly far more common than is reported, as many needed no treatment.  



Surgeon Superintendent Charles Smith gives an insight into the psychological state of the Irish females in his charge. The Duke of Cornwall sailed in July 1850, immediately preceding the Blackfriar. Charles had a huge caseload of twenty-six cases of Hysteria to deal with. His opening remarks stated that the Irish were a highly susceptible race and that the women ‘suffered much from Grief and depression of Spirits at leaving their friends and native Country’. He states many of the women were not put on the sick list as their paroxysms were of short duration and their general health was good. He describes varied symptoms such as loss of power of speech, paralysis and ‘extravagant hallucinations’.[vi]

                                                                                                                                                                        ourfamilypast.com

In 1849 John Moody, then surgeon on the Lord Auckland, also refers to the spirits of the women on board. He treats them with ‘kindness, at the same time with firmness’ to restore their spirits, noting its no easy matter where Irish convicts are concerned.[vii] Surgeon A.F. Macleroy (Phoebe 1845) reports of seasickness, ‘accompanied as usual in females with Syncope <[fainting]> & Hysteria in various degrees & shapes, many cases being very troublesome tho’ not placed on the Sick List.[viii] Surgeon James Clarke’s (Greenlaw 1844) general remarks comment almost entirely on food and diet, but he does generalize about the extreme mental depression of women on his Sick List and how this is generally the case amongst the lower and ignorant Irish class.[ix] Signs and symptoms of  mental suffering are also scattered throughout the English female ships, even with several suicide attempts mentioned.[x] Most Surgeons report they handle their cases successfully with treatments ranging from ‘constant employment’ to shaving the head and cold-water ablutions, blood-letting, enemas and various dosages of substances such as Submuriate of Mercury, aloetic pills and Laudanum.

  
                     Surgeon Superintendent James Hall on 4 ships 1820-1833, Aust Convict & Convict Ships Board, pintrest

Examination of sixty-four Surgeons reports of both Irish and English female ships which landed in VDL, twenty-nine made mention of one or more cases of Hysteria, an indication of the mental and emotional stress of women undertaking a voyage with incredible risks and uncertainties.[xi] Given the series of traumatic events these women endured, it would be highly likely that many of them would indeed have their mental health severely compromised. Likewise, the development of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder would be a high possibility, hence affecting their ability to reintegrate successfully with an extremely high probability of developing alcohol dependence.[xii]

Mary Brien gained her freedom and married George Gray in 1859. [xiii]  Whether married life settled her, is also unknown, but in 1875 Mary Brien-ex-Gray, died a pauper in a residence on the corner of Molle and Golbourn Streets in Hobart.[xiv]
To conclude, that Mary Breen suffered from any ill mental health is pure conjecture. She had times of compliance and times of turbulence.  Why was she a difficult woman? Perhaps she suffered from mental illness and was damaged by a system which intended to force conformity, limit personal freedom and ‘reform’ the wild ones, but had little understanding of emotional and mental suffering, treatment and subsequent personal and societal cost.

                                                                                                                                convict love token   sydneylivingmuseum.com.au



[i] librariestas.ent.sirsidynix.net.au  NAME_INDEXES:1375061 accessed 8 August 2018
[ii] www.orphaneschool.org.au/show orphan accessed8 June 2018
[iii] Female convicts in VDL database, Female Convicts Research Centre Accessed 16 June 2018
[iv] www.femaleconvicts.org.au/convict-ships/convict-ship-records
[v] www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3480686/ Women and Hysteria in the History of Mental Health accessed 1 Aug 2018
[vi] www.femaleconvicts.org.au/convict-ships/convict-ship-records
[vii] www.femaleconvicts.org.au/convict-ships/convict-ship-records
[viii] www.femaleconvicts.org.au/convict-ships/convict-ship-records
[ix] www.femaleconvicts.org.au/convict-ships/convict-ship-records
[x] www.femaleconvicts.org.au/convict-ships/convict-ship-records, Emma Eugenia1846, East London1843, Mary Ann 1822, Tasmania 1844
[xi] www.femaleconvicts.org.au/convict-ships/convict-ship-records
[xiii]librariestas.ent.sirsidynix.net.au   
[xiv] "Australia, Tasmania, Miscellaneous Records, 1829-2001," database with images, FamilySearch (Cemetery records > Burials and cremations, Cornelian Bay Cemetery > Feb 1875-Jul 1876, AF70/1/2 no 699-1186 > image 101 of 510; Tasmanian Archives and Heritage Office, Hobart. Accessed 20 July 2018

Tuesday, October 9, 2018

Mary Rose, a 'beautiful lady'.









Having begun on the convict trail that wends its interesting journey back through the family trees that are my heritage, I take another detour through the forest.



I've looked into three of my maternal grandmother's grandparents and been  amazed at what I've found. Her father William Cupit with his father Martin, the convict from Derbyshire, and her mother Kezia Rose with Kezia's father Charles Rose, son of an Irish female convict and being born in the Female Factory.

Then there's Martin's wife, Sarah Murphy, coming out on the ship at age 10 with her convict mother from Ireland. Finding such a rich and diverse heritage has widened my knowledge of Tasmanian history greatly. 

I knew my grandmother well. When I now look back, I realise how tangibly close our early colonial history really is. In our last Convict UTas unit, we heard one historian's tale of  her grandfather, who she remembers well too. When he was a lad, he witnessed the final day at Port Arthur when he watched the last convicts file out of the precinct in the mid 1870's. This colonial era was in living memory of living memory. I feel like I can almost touch the memories of these ancestors in  my own mind, particularly when we can visit so many intact sites in and around Hobart.



I was in Grade 4 when we celebrated the Bicentenary of Cook's 1770 landing. We learned the story at school and studied the convict system.








 "Nanna, do you have convicts in your family?" her curious 9 year old grandaughter asked. Nanna squirmed and told me that perhaps there might have been one way back and dropped the subject quickly. 
I now know this "one" was her grandfather Martin, goodness, she could have actually known the man. The "one" was also her grandmother's mother and her grandfather's mother. She was too close to them in history to have been free of the dreadful convict legacy- shame. Van Diemen's Land changed its name and did everything possible to hide that legacy. The convict sons and daughters became loyal subjects to Queen Victoria and a collective amnesia settled over the population like a heavy, silent blanket. Our convict sites were ignored, left to decay, and re-purposed.

My final research was with Nanna's maternal grandmother. Mary Rose was Charles Rose's wife. Nee Lovell, her mother was Elizabeth Smith. With a name like Smith, I had been putting this research off.

Turns out the Lovells have been hard too, there's an awful  lot of them.
Mary Lovell first appears when she marries Charles Rose at the home of John Smith, Castle Forbes Bay. Charles is 21 and Mary is 15, very young. Doing the maths, Mary was born 1853ish. Castle Forbes Bay is just south of Franklin. Its my, unsuccessful so far, aim to find out how and why my ancestors ended up in the Huon. By the early 1850's, farming was well established in Castle Forbes Bay, but it was in the timber industry that the work existed. Men came here to work and this is probably what drew Charles to the area where Mary was already living. The Victorian Gold Rush meant extremely high demand for timber, and this was coming from the Huon. Local papers advertised. In 1856 and 57 Dr Crowthe and James Scully advertised plenty of employment for sawyers, splitters and bushmen at Castle Forbes Bay.

Charles and Mary started their large family with Kezia born in 1869. Charles was a farmer at Castle Forbes Bay then. In 1871 he was a farmer/settler in Franklin and with each birth register he was a bushman, a labourer, a farmer or a carpenter at Fleurty's Point, still at CFB. So clearly life for the man of the house meant working at whatever you could when it was available.
By the 1890's when Mary and Charles had their last two children, they had relocated to Port Esperence. Lillian Lockley registered her youngest brother's birth and stated her mother's maiden name incorrectly as Smith. On registering her youngest sister's birth she called herself Mary Lockley. It seemed christian names were interchangeable. Indeed, most of her 11 siblings changed, shortened, misspelt and used their middle name. It seems Percy Rheuben ended up being Luther Charles Garnet known as Charley. And Nalta Rummond ended up Charlie Jackson (these are the WW1 stories in a previous blog). So while Charles was working, Mary was child rearing.


 two of the Rose sisters, Eva Christie born 1875, and 
Kezia Cupit born 1869


Charles and Mary  lived out their lives in Dover where the youngest of the children went to the local school. They had many grandchildren and happily lived to see them.

In her latter years, Mary Rose joined the Salvation Army, which was active in Dover early in the 1900's. 


A group of Salvo's, taken from A History of Dover & Port Esperence by Norm Beechy & Dorothy Baker. Seated 2nd from right is Harry Schnell. Harry was born in 1874, so this photo would be right for Mary's era, in fact, I'd hazard a guess that that could even be Mary standing on the right.

She and her youngest son Ted both became officers. A War Cry indicates the Army presence in Dover as early as 1906 referencing Envoy Milsom, Brother Page, Treasurer Rose and Lieutenant Percival Stafford. In the early 1920's, Sister Mary Rose is listed as holding a post amoung 11 other women. 
In 1915, Dover Salvation Army opened, built, painted, fenced and completed out buildings in record time, their own new hall, 20 feet by 40 on a stone foundation. Now a private residence.

In August 1924, when Mary was aged 74, she accidentally drowned. My maths says she would have been 71, anyway, it seems at 6:30 Saturday evening a small fire started in a wooden part of her chimney. Mary went outside with a dipper of water. As she hadn't returned in 10 minutes, Charles called for her. The night was dark, Mary was very shortsighted and there was no answer. Eventually neighbours and police found her body in the water at the foot of the twenty foot drop behind their house. Charles, son Frank and granddaughter Connie gave evidence at the inquest.



Mary's death in the War Cry

 So poor Mary had a sad end, but she had reached a good age and Charles stated at the inquest that he had been happily married for 54 years, my maths says 56 years, but we won't quibble.
Charles and Mary Rose's house on the waterfront at Dover
behind the house down to the bay........
           .....and again, the drop behind the house, now safely fenced off

Aunty Rene, one of  Kezia's daughters said grandmother Rose was a 'beautiful lady'. Charles died 17 months later at age 81. They would both be buried in the cemetery which is now the War Memorial where their son Charley is now commemorated.

The cemetery can be seen centre at the front in this pic on what is now the War Memorial.
Cover of Dover history Group's leaflet.



A History of Dover & Port Esperance, Norm Beechy & Dorothy Baker
Caroline Haigh- transcript UTas Convicts in Context Unit
Librariestas: Tasmanian Names Index
Lydia Nicholson-Convict Heritage Sites transcript UTas Convicts in Context Unit
Trove: Huon Times, 5 August 1924 article136038628
Trove: Tas Daily News 19 August 1857
War Cry, unknown source